Trial Reflection 5
I am a lawyer on the dead team. I personally saw a lot of points that the Alive team pointed out that helped the dead team. I didn’t think it was fair that none of the jury members even researched the books, therefore we lost the case due to the jury members lack of interest in literature that we presented as evidence. At the first open debate, the lawyer I was going up against didn’t even have anything to say, so to say unprepared. When I did The Catcher In The Rye, Phoebe Cauffield, the SMART 10 year old girl, stalled and had her team mouth the answers, therefore I ran out of time and got no where because she didn’t say or do anything. I did The Jungle and had all questions prepared but the alive team helped me more by asking Dead Team questions. There was no clear point that they made. I believe the jury members picked them for the win because of popularity and the majority of the team.
I know pheobe didn’t do well. She foucused more on the acting then they actual questions. Comment
I AGREE With both of you.
um…………yeah
I’ll comment again so you don’t kill yourself because your easy to make fun of HaHa
I disagree with your comment on why the alive team won, but sincerely respect your opinion. However, I’d have to say that I don’t think Mr. Amico should have influenced the jury any more than he might have; in a real court case, the judge wouldn’t influence the jury, and so it should be in our mock trial. :]
Good thoughts, though. It’s good to know not everyone’s so peachy-keen about it all.
well guess what your adopted and you don’t have any friends
That has to be the wierdest thing you could ever post. :[